What is the preferred method of Bat Altering?

We understand that there are many ways to improve the performance of your Composite or Aluminum Softball or Baseball bats. Bat Rolling and Bat Shaving are the most common methods currently in use. Bat conversions use to be one of the favorites but a few manufacturers and associations started cracking down on copyright infringement and this has caused conversions to become almost a “black market” process now.

We’re interested in what you think is the preferred method of improving the performance of you bat is. Please make your choice below on our poll.

USSSA Convention News – New Balls & Worlds Dates

On monday novenber 5th USSSA held a manufactures ball test in Kissimmee Fl at the national headquarters. All manufactures were invited to attend. 5 manufactures attended and the end result was the .52/275 ball was approved for play starting april 1 2010. The .40/325 will stay in play until the inventory of them is sold out. Directors can chose which ball to use until the .40/325 are gone. Also starting Jan 1 2010 no more multi-layer balls can be produced for USSSA.
The new ball is named the classic plus, it will be blue stitch with red lettering.

As for the saftey part of the ball, yes it is MUCH safer. A .44/375 ball has a SI of 1900-2700 this new ball has a SI of 466.
SI= severity index. This is a NOCSAE test that tests for impact to hard structure, like your skull. At 1200 SI it has been determined that an impact of that force will break bone and cause serious trauma. If it is a shot to the skull that serious trauma is brain damage.

USSSA E Program – No Hr’s allowed – Any HR’s hit = Offensive ejections & Inning Ending Out

Worlds Dates

Men’s B Sept 17-19 Disney
Men’s C Sept 23-26 Disney
Men’s D Sept 23-26 Disney
Men’s E West Sept 16-19 Aurora

Women’s B, C, D Sept 23-26 Disney

Military Aug 20-22 Panama City, Fl

Hispanic Sept 10-12 Gilbert, Az

Mixed C, D, E Oct 22-24 Disney
Mixed C, D, E Wes22-24 Gilbert, Az

Women’s 35 & over West- Oct 1-3 Salem, Oregon
Women’s 35 & over North- Oct 1-3 North Branford, CT
Women’s 35 & over South- Oct 8-10 Lexington, SC

Black American Sept 17-19 Birmingham, AL

Bat Rolling Machines – How to see through the sales pitch!

If you’ve ever been in the market for a bat rolling machine I’m sure you’ve found that there are several sites out there that other similar products. Each one of them trying to sell you their product and of course they all point out features of their roller that are different (and better) than the competitor. I’ll try to clear the air of some of the important features you need to be concerned with and those that really don’t matter.

Perpendicular or Parallel Rolling Machine?
I’ve been rolling bats for over 5 years now. The first bat rolling machines (in their current design) were developed about 5-6 years ago. All of the first bat rollers were of the Perpendicular style and roll the bat lengthwise up and down the barrel. A couple years ago the Parallel roller was developed and now everyone has followed suit. Listen clearly here. The parallel roller was ONLY designed to speed up the rolling process. It DOES NOT do a better job rolling. You’ll read that parallel rolling is needed in conjunction with perpendicular rolling because it hits spots that the where missed by the perpendicular roller. Simply put, it is NOT TRUE. I’ve been rolling bats for 5+ years and we’ve rolled bats every possible way and Perpendicular rolling gives you the same results that Parallel rolling or a combination of Parallel/Perpendicular does. There is really no need to spend the extra money on an already overpriced parallel roller.

Roller Sizes – What is the optimal size?
This paragraph only applies if you’ve made the choice to go with a parallel roller. From what I’ve seen there are 3 different designs of Parallel Rollers on the market. The roller sizes range from 6-7 inches in length.

Most slowpitch and fastpitch softball bats will have at least a 10″ barrel. With this being said, it DOES NOT matter whether you use a roller with a 6 or 7 inch roller. Either way you will still be able to adequately roll your bat. You’ll read that the 6″ rollers are better because then allow the composite to flex more than the 7′ rollers. Again this is NOT TRUE and should not be factored in when making your decision on which roller to purchase.

Bearings – What type is the correct type?
This information may be more than most people will understand but I’ll include it anyway. You’ll see many different terms thrown around when it comes to the type of bearings that each machine uses and how their type is better than the next. The truth is that you should be looking for a unit that uses good quality sealed bearing that is lubricated. The last thing you want to get is a unit that requires you to lubricate your bearings in order for smooth operation. I recently came across a site that claims their new higher priced rollers have special bearings. They use big names like “Thrust Bearings” and “Radial Bearings”. It doesn’t matter. These big names just give them a reason to be able to charge you more money for something that you don’t really need.

Roller Materials – What’s the deal?
Again you’ll see some different material claims being offered by different manufacturers. Most manufactures will use a high impact Polyethylene material or nylon which has a hardness of Shore D 68. These are roughly the hardness of a golf ball. This material provides great wear resistance which equates to little need to ever replace them because of wear and tear. Some claim their rollers are precision machined for more consistency.

Again this is just a sales pitch and gives them another reason to charge you more money. If you can find a reputable company that offers you a lifetime warranty and is willing to work with you then there is absolutely no need to worry about what type of roller material is being used.

Bat Roller Patents – What’s the truth?
I’m only including this information because it’s being used by some as a deterrent to convince you to purchase their unit vs. others on the market. The truth to this is that most likely a patent will never be issued on this type of product. There are a couple reasons it will be rejected. The main reason is that the company that applied for the patent is not the first to market a bat rolling machine (or the control compression method). This has been around for many years in many different forms. Their patent application was submitted in early 2008 and one of the biggest reasons for rejections is that you CAN NOT have a patent for things that have already been on the market prior to the patent being submitted. Since this patent was submitted in 2008 and there are photos of “controlled compression” devices dating back to 2005 available for view on the internet. It would reason that these devices have been around long before any patent application was submitted. This will make it an easy decision to the US Patent Office. In fact I believe the company that submitted the patent request has already received the initial rejection to their request. If you want to take the time you can do some research yourself and find the status of the patent and see the reasons for the rejection. You have no reason to worry about support or warranties from other companies offering similar products as they WILL NOT be effected by these claims. Again it’s simply a sales pitch to steer you into buying their units.

In summary, we recommend you purchase your next bat rolling machine from a company that gives you REAL information and not a sales pitch. If a company is charging you extra for this upgrade and that upgrade when in fact there reason is no measurable difference in product you have to ask yourself is this an honest company? If they aren’t willing to give you honest information (regardless of what they offer) then what makes you think they’ll be around when you have problems or questions. Most reputable companies will respond to your email questions in a timely manner and give you honest information.

NCAA proposes ban on composite barrel bats – Update 11/4/09

Updated – Here’s and excellent link with some additional information on the ban and effect of bat rolling.

Here’s some information I came across recently regarding the NCAA proposed ban on composite barrel bats for 2010. Apparently it’s a little more than a proposed ban. In a recent catalog I received from Baseball Express I noticed that MANY of the 2010 model line clearly says NOT NCAA APPROVED.

ERIC KOLENICH TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
Published: September 1, 2009

The NCAA has put the brakes on composite bats.

The Playing Rules Oversight Panel last week affirmed a decision made in July to put an immediate and indefinite moratorium on the use of the often-tampered piece of hardware. It will keep examining the issue to see if the moratorium can be lifted. But high schools and youth leagues, where composite bats also are prevalent, aren’t ready to take such decisive action.

The National Federation of State High School Associations says it doesn’t intend to ban composite bats. Tom O’Connor, a division director of the East Zone in the PONY League, predicts that USA Baseball, which governs youth leagues in America, will follow the NCAA’s lead. But no one knows if that will happen any time soon. Nonetheless, many coaches are ready to give composite bats the boot. “If we’re going to have standards, we need to abide by them,” University of Virginia coach Brian O’Connor said. “I think they should be illegal.” VCU coach Paul Keyes agrees. Said Keyes, “I think any time you manipulate equipment, like throwing a spitball, you’re gaining an edge.”

A composite bat looks like an aluminum bat on the outside. But it is made of graphite woven together in a precise pattern. While aluminum bats perform best the day they are purchased, composite bats perform better the longer they are used. Players soon found out they could accelerate the process of breaking in a bat by “rolling” it. “Rolled” bats can be done professionally for about $30. The bat is put under intense pressure between two wheels and rolled back and forth. Other common methods including running over it with a car or hitting it against a light pole up to a thousand times.

The result is an improved trampoline effect on the bat — the ball comes off the bat as much as 20 mph faster. And that means better offensive numbers. During 2007-2009, offensive statistics averaged from the entire NCAA went up in multiple categories. Batting average improved from .291 to .302. The average runs scored in a game went from 6.1 to 6.88. Earned run averages ballooned from 5.12 to 5.85.

Coaches say that the ball has a different look coming off the bat and that the hit makes a much different sound than the normal “ping” of aluminum. “If I was coaching a high school team, everyone would be swinging a composite bat,” said Chuck Bowen, baseball manager at Disco Sports. “You do get a competitive edge with a composite bat.” Before the College World Series, 25 composite bats were selected for testing. Of the 25 bats tested, 20 did not meet NCAA standards, meaning they had been broken in either intentionally or through repeated use. All the bats belonging to Virginia were approved. U.Va., which has a contract with Rawlings, almost exclusively uses aluminum bats.

Not only is the speed of the ball coming off the bat threatening the integrity of the game, it’s threatening the pitcher’s life. With the ball traveling well over 100 mph, many coaches believe that a pitcher doesn’t have enough time to react if the ball is hit straight at him. “Everyone is fearing the day in college or high school baseball that something bad happens because the bats are too dangerous,” Benedictine coach Sean Ryan said. “It’s one of the things I worry about the most.”

While an immediate ban on composite bats at all levels — NCAA, high school and youth — may seem appropriate, either for safety or fairness reasons, a ban would have enormous ramifications. Composite bats at $400 a bat, if all that merchandise can’t be sold, a substantial amount of money will be lost, probably on the manufacturer’s end. If Easton or DeMarini is stuck with composite bats they can’t sell, they could choose to sue the NCAA or the NFHS because the bats were previously approved.

The fact that the NCAA is banning them despite these issues shows just how serious they believe composite bats threaten the game.

“They need to ban them, they just can’t do it now,” Bowen said. He believes a ban needs to be grandfathered in, so parents who just bought a new bat won’t have to buy a new one, and the bats that haven’t been sold won’t go to waste. Tom O’Connor disagrees. He thinks a grandfather scenario isn’t likely for youth baseball. “My personal opinion is that safety is far more important than sales and marketing,” he said. “Subsequently, the ban on composite bats [for youth leagues] would be immediate.”

If high school is the only level left allowing composite bats in 2010, Bowen says there could be a run on composite bats. If high schools don’t ban the bat, “I guarantee I will see a spike in my business,” Bowen said. By banning the bat, the NCAA is acknowledging its superiority. And now every high schooler who can get his hands on one will want it. “If it were all about safety, everyone would use wood,” Ryan said, because the ball doesn’t come off the bat as fast.

But bat manufacturers have a large stake in the continued use of aluminum and composite bats. Besides stock already produced, they want their bats used by the best teams in the world so they can be seen on TV and craved by every young player who plays a recreational game. And when it comes to winning championships, hitting home runs, getting looks from professional scouts and becoming the next big thing in amateur baseball, right now, composite bats are just one of the necessary tools. “Everyone wants to hit the ball farther,” said Darryn Vinson, the owner of Batter’s Choice in Petersburg. “Composite and aluminum bats are going to hit the ball farther.”

Bat Rolling – Legal or NOT Legal?

Let me start off first by saying that you only need to concern yourself with whether or not Bat Rolling is “accepted” by the associations. You are not breaking any laws by rolling your bat. There has only been 1 court case in regards to bat altering. The ASA sued 2 individuals a few years back for painting bats to resemble a different. Alot of people think they were sued for bat shaving or bat rolling. This is not the case, they were sued for trademark infringement. The ASA was awarded approximately $100,00 in damages. Since then there have been no suits filed for bat shaving or bat rolling.

There are always questions as to whether or not bat rolling is accepted in a certain association or not. I’ve listed the rule definitions below so you can make the choice for yourself. The thing to remember is that currently there is NO difinative way to tell if a bat has been rolled or not. Bat Rolling is ony acelerating the break in process that will occur normally as your bat ages and gets more and more hits on it.

USSSA

Altered Bats – Excessive Pressure
Included in the USSSA view of what is an altered or doctored bat are any bats that are subjected to pressure
in any manner that exceeds that of striking the bat against an approved ball traveling at game like speeds.
Such excess pressure would include, but is not limited to, any compression, rolling, placing in a vice,
hitting a stationary object such as a pole, etc.

ASA
The only thing I could find in their rule book is “The characteristics of any approved equipment can not be changed” This would be open to
interpretation. If you understand what bat rolling is doing then you can argue that it could be considered legal as well as illegal. As I mentioned earlier
you are simply accerating the break in process that will happen under normal use of the bat. You are doing nothing more.

NSA
“An altered bat is considered altered when the physical structure of the legal bat has been changed in any way, or when an illegal or non approved bat has been made up in such a way as to appear to be a legal bat. Examples of altering a bat are, but not limited to the following: Painting a bat, replacing the handle or shaving the handle or barrel or the taper changed in any way. Such as by sandpapering or applying a solvent to the surface such as fingernail polish remover or by any other means. Removing or replacing the plug or changed in any way other than factory repairs. Had the knob removed/ replaced or changed in any way or had anything removed or added to the inside or outside of the bat other than the legal way to tape the bat the specified and appropriate place as described in the NSA Rule Book”. NSA does not specifically spell it out so you could also again argue either way.

In the end the choice is yours. You don’t need to worry about detection since it is not currently detectable. Most associations DO NOT specifically address the Bat Rolling so again it can be interpreted many different ways. This is why this is one of the most debated topics around the sofball and baseball community.